Mike and Chris +1 
El 19-10-2015, a las 11:31, Chris Disspain <ceo@auda.org.au> escribió:

Indeed.

However, logically it would depend on each SO/ACs operating principles.


Cheers,

Chris

On 20 Oct 2015, at 01:29 , Chartier, Mike S <mike.s.chartier@intel.com> wrote:

That level of detail was not determined

-----Original Message-----
From: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Nigel Roberts
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 10:27 AM
To: accountability-cross-community@icann.org
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] individual SO/AC elected Board member removal



On 19/10/15 15:15, Chris Disspain wrote:


The relevant SO/AC then makes a decision. Removal of the Director requires a 75% majority in the relevant SO/AC.


75% of what?

(a) All Council members?
(b) Council Members voting
(c) All SO Members?
(d) SO Members casting a vote


At least one of these would appear, in practice, to be unlikely in the extreme to ever be triggered.


_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community