Hello
I already made a comment on the chat during CCWG call today, making
it here again.
I think the human rights language in the summary is a bit confusing.
"Reinforcing Adherence to Human Rights Protocols" (pages 7, 8, 31)
is not exactly what WP4 proposed. The word "protocols" makes no
sense in this context, it will be good either for diplomatic
language or for IETF, but not for the CCWG document. As far as I am
concerned, we are not suggesting to commit to any "protocols",
furthermore, we even decided not to suggest to mention any
instruments. Even within the context of international human rights
law mentioning "protocols" doesn't make any sense.
I believe just "human rights" or "internationally recognised human
rights" would be much better wording. But not "protocols" because it
is confusing.
Best regards
Tanya
On 09/11/15 22:42, Bernard Turcotte
wrote:
All,
Please find
attached the first full draft of the executive summary which
will be discussed on the call tomorrow.
Apologies for
the delay in getting this out but people have been working
almost around the clock.
Bernard
Turcotte
Staff Support
for the
co-chairs.
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community