Leon,

You are correct, I would like second read the Legal Sub Team / Legal Advisors during the time I can be available. I don't have a preference with the order of the rest of the agenda.

greetings, el
-- 
Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini

On Mar 30, 2015, at 21:50, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe@sanchez.mx> wrote:

Dear Eberhard,

If I am understanding correctly you would like to have the Legal Subteam discussion first and then the Jurisdiction approach?

If that is the case, I have no objection.


Best regards,


León

El 30/03/2015, a las 12:55, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.na> escribió:

Can we move the Legal Subteam item forward on the agenda, please?

I have what they call a hard stop after one hour, and wish to participate in the Legal debate.

The GAO stuff needs a second read anyway so we'll sort that out next time. In order to speed this up it really would be helpful if the GAO document were provided in PDF.

EL

-- 
Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini

On Mar 30, 2015, at 20:19, Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org> wrote:

Dear all,

 

Below you will find a proposed agenda in preparation for your call #18 - Tuesday, 31 March – 06:00-08:00 UTC (time converter): 

1. Welcome, roll-call, statement of interest
2. Confirm conclusions from Istanbul
  • WP2 fundamental Bylaws
  • Jurisdiction approach
  • Legal Subteam working methods & input received
  • WP1 community mechanism
  • WP2 mission & core values, reconsideration process
  • ST-WP progress and planning
3. Timeline
  • Buenos Aires
4 Engagement 
5. AOB

Thanks,
Best regards
Alice