The early on documents I located CLEARLY defend trademarks from domains using the Trademark. How and when did that founding model to protect Trademarks get kicked to the curb? It should be reinstated.
Sincerely
Carrie Devorah
www.centerforcopyrightintegrity.com

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
I agree with Avri.  Further, Board B seems to become some kind of mutant hybrid of Board and management, which should be different roles.

While we can always explore it fully (within some sense of time constraints), I would not see much mileage in doing so.

Greg

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> wrote:
Hi,

I have never understood the appeal of such a model.  To me it seems like twice as much Board to worry about in an environment of never really knowing where the ultimate responsibility lay.

avri

On 19-Feb-15 13:00, Mr R.T. Daniel wrote:
Thinking out loud.
So is there any mileage in having an icann A & icann B.
"A" board = public interest & contract co.
"B" board private non profit implementing Board A 's ..policy frameworks....etc...etc..
Board B answerable to board A?
RD


_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community



_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community




--
Sincerely
CARRIE Devorah
562 688 2883

 

DISCLAIMER :
With the continuing crossing and interfacing of platforms both on & off line both with & without our knowledge nor approval to note nothing sent over the Internet anymore is ever private nor should be presumed to be so. If it is that much of a secret, say nothing. If you must? Take a lesson from our military- hand write the note, chew then swallow