I doubt that it will be all that difficult. It should be fairly clear what the CWG is relying on the CCWG to deliver in order to directly support the CWG's proposals. Furthermor, the CWG is commencing a 2-day high-intensity work period, with 3 2-hour calls per day. That, in itself, should help clarify the WS1A list, and the CCWG co-chairs have asked the CWG to take note of these "dependencies" as the work period unfolds, and to compile as specific a list of these as possible.GregOn Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 4:51 AM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.na> wrote:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Roelof,
you have a way with words :-)-O
But, I am not sure the Co-Chairs are getting it.
el
On 2015-04-13 09:44 , Roelof Meijer wrote:
> Not intending to be cynical, but I wonder if enough of the work
> would go to WS1b to make up for the time we would spend on
> discussing what should be in WS1a and what in WS1b..
>
> Best,
>
> Roelof
[...]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQIVAwUBVSuDf5cFHaN5RT+rAQIkVg//Q5i3HUnbmIfLSU1GOEZ1lI4lQ92fJYUb
pLmgu1qw+tL0JHeMAKiON7Bqz35QX6XmArU45Cjuxd7QsaHQ5aV9AK9eGM7f8Ml9
rQ6yU8muDesTu0AnNRZvDxF6msmnT5pxL+QjHfOsAiZdICfy7gLJEUsFjGz5KpGc
oPueie2DpIzIplueFU9JUkuTlIfvClZRGR/bBYnWnqyd1OyP3ewzVvbFrCCfFWft
YPDslwVscrBPFpeycqPCSaZ/FYAP/lGvd3uqv0FsuTSY+3aU1Nmv3xn3Kb7LibfI
l+dYE6I32loXZsx7Lva4ueXtiL1EtGL+VJKP8YXIUTGqfF7MHWT4wJESRPodjAqK
VQE8ZPWiiz8EVTKLcjFJ2HRXE4HBnJEh8f5+r8+XU52T6LcoqEQ563rDoBD2Bucs
EP00HG1ASnucZ3zuz0GEYPRQCx5UWnwZK53E921nx5D0bHSUl35JnW0vCIdOY/hj
OkA0Tm7whlo3dbOSDfPFxMg9pUJf7RCqYkiFYu/v9j6pELwlp/aQJ9mPCnQb3cwy
LzmC/ue/OMxJPqv0xJ65z6YOob0hY7bdWT4BLdNPAD7C1Ak2Sw+/LvycgqQ7fDon
NKqF3CKOK4FxbLj1EaSMxK3IlmyXcP0AOWo8QLD+en7BXbpaLRVvWePsG2WEcoLA
WPQF6DuKUjc=
=fnMG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community