I'd like to join Bill Drakes advice that issues related to specific communities should be solved internally. It would help this group to focus on the essential tasks.

Wolf-Ulrich

Sent from my personal phone

Am 09.12.2014 um 14:55 schrieb Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com>:

Dear Thomas( Schneider)

As you remember since long time ago, I expressed my willingness and volunteered to be one of the GAC Members to accountability

The issues goes back to July when for the first time the issue of Accountability working group was announced  by ICANN

This was reflected in several e-mails exchanged with Header Dryden the GAC chair.

When you ( Thomas Schneider ) took, the chair responsibilities I did recall you again of that request.

Your response was not clear , Finally you announced the names and put me as additional GAC members representing ICG ( FROM GAC)  .Your message was interpreted that I am not Member of CCWG but a Participant

Then it is incumbent on you to clarify THE MATTER

I AM A CCWG MEMBER AND NOT PARTICIPANT

PLS MAKE NECESSARY CORRECTIVE MEASURES

Regards

K.arasteh

2014-12-09 12:26 GMT+01:00 Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.na>:

I think the answer lies here:

http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-dt/2014-December/000123.html

where it clearly states that you are not one of the 5 GAC "members"
but "been appointed as ICG liaison to the CCWG" which from the
context I assume means CCWG-Accountability.

Why don't you take this up with your GAC chair, Mr Schneider?

el


On 2014-12-09 11:45 , Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
> Dear All,
> Sorry my connection was interrupted two times, I repeat
> Dear All
>
> Most of the thing foreseen to be done are directly related to ICG
> activities .
> I do not understand how the repreventatives of  ICG would be given the
> right to take part in consensus building.The confusion came from the
> message sent by Thomas  in his announcement that  it did not  make it
> clear that I am among the 5 members of GAC ,REPRESTING  ICG.
> There are problems in the whole process.
> I agree with Richard that it is impossible that more than 150 people
> attend a live virtual meeting of one hour.
> I am not aware of the process in CWG but in ICG only the members raise
> hand and ask for the floor.
> I do not see any light at the end of the CCWG Tunnel.
> I need clarification from chair and corrective measures from Thomas to
> announce me as he should have announced it
> Regards
> Kavouss
>
[...]

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community