As previously stated, your fake astonishment is based on a purposeful false interpretation of my email, claiming falsely, on purpose that my proposal was going to lead to world peace. Re-read the original email, and stop your fraudulent act in an effort to get me banned. My post was a respectful expansion on the original topic, tying it to ICANN's needed solutions, and the purposeful over-reaction by my "detractors" on this email list is akin to a bunch of whining complainers who want to kick someone out of group because they don't want to fix the problem being discussed, ICANN's flawed whistleblower system which won't be accepted by the U.S. Congress as is. Your "gang" has worked hard to paint me as some sort of scoundrel from day one, and I have been offering respectful solutions and comments in the face of constant fake nonsense. But, since the group has already made up
its mind to be swayed by theatrics, instead of reading what was written, I advise you to calm down and act like adults. Ron |
Your accusation that my reaction to your post is "fake" and "invented is insulting in the extreme. I have already had one friend lose a colleague in the atrocities, and learned that a close family friend would have been at the Bataclan last night but for a change of plans. I assure you that my reaction to your post as a response to a message about the Paris attacks is completely and utterly genuine. To say that I and my colleagues have done something offensive borders on the deeply disturbed. I don't know what sick game you've come here to play, or what "cheap thrill" you get out of your interventions, but it has no place here. We have work to do. I hope that our co-chairs and the Ombudsman will take swift and permanent action to ban Mr. Baione. Indeed, I would go so far as to suggest a ban from all ICANN working groups, as he is clearly incorrigible. On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Ron Baione via Accountability-Cross-Community <accountability-cross-community@icann.org> wrote:
|