Becky,

In your second slide, it says: „..Implementing Consensus Policies..”. Although I am not sure if this is supposed to mean that ICANN only implements policies for which there is consensus, the condition of having reached consensus before implementing policy is supposed to be a (high)  standard of behavior that should be measured for accountability purposes

Best,

Roelof

From: <Burr>, Becky Burr <Becky.Burr@neustar.biz>
Date: maandag 9 februari 2015 17:03
To: Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org>, "accountability-cross-community@icann.org" <accountability-cross-community@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Additional Document for discussion

I have made a quick attempt to articulate the standard of behavior against which ICANN might be measured for accountability purposes.  It roughly corresponds to the Mission Statement and Core Values in the ICANN bylaws today, but has some additions that and modifications consistent with various suggestions that I’ve heard from the group.  If I missed your suggestion, please accept my apologies.  This is just to start the discussion.  


J. Beckwith Burr

Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer

1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006

Office: + 1.202.533.2932  Mobile:  +1.202.352.6367  / becky.burr@neustar.biz / www.neustar.biz


From: Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org>
Date: Monday, February 9, 2015 at 4:38 PM
To: Accountability Community <accountability-cross-community@icann.org>
Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] Revised agenda - Meeting #11

Dear all,
In anticipation of your meeting #11, please find attached a revised agenda.
Thanks
Best regards
Alice