Thank you Leon. This is one of the issues I have not followed in huge depth, and I acknowledge the expertise and energy deployed through WP4 as well as all the other comments that have come in on this.
I would like to offer two thoughts.
First, this proposed approach is fine with me so long as our lawyers can certify that "will not enter into force" does indeed render the clause ineffective until the FoI it mentions is developed. I understand from you (offline) that this is the case, but others might wonder the same thing.
Second, wherever we land on this question, I just want to signal my own view as a "Member" of the CCWG that I am relaxed about whether this is WS1 or 2 - my own personal view is that the important thing is that the approach to interpreting and applying human rights in the ICANN context is developed by the ICANN community before bylaws-type obligations or requirements come into effect.
This text seems to deliver that. So would pushing the matter off to WS2. I'll happily stand with consensus either way.
cheers
Jordan