Thanks for that clarification Bruce.

On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au> wrote:
Hello Arun,


>>  To bring us back to Jordan's initial suggestion, if the Board were to play some role in the Single Member model - with the form of decision-making and areas of decision making clearly specified -- what would the Board's take be? Would it still oppose the SMCM?

That sounds a bit circular. i.e. the Board is a member of the member that is a member of ICANN.   I guess an individual could be a Board director, and a member of the single member.    Note though that in general if you are a Board director the bylaws don’t allow you to also be a Council member to keep a clear separation of roles.

It is currently possible to be a member of an Advisory Committee and be a Board director.    I used to be a member of SSAC, and also a director on the  board.   However after discussion with Paul Vixie - I came to the conclusion that it was better not to be a member of both to avoid perceptions of conflict of interest.     So for at least a year I ceased being active in SSAC, and elected not to put my name forward for re-appointment to SSAC.


Regards,
Bruce Tonkin




_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community



--
-- 
Head, Cyber Initiative
Observer Research Foundation, New Delhi
+91-9871943272