Could we add at the end "as a opposed to a multilateral solution."?

On Thursday, April 30, 2015, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:

I have a real problem with this.

There is no doubt that the private sector has been a major and influential component since its inception, but it is similarly true that governments and users (albeit in varying models) have been an integral component of ICANN. Our roles may be different, but our roots go as deep, and the import of the public interest in ICANN cannot and should not be swept under the carpet.

Alan

At 28/04/2015 08:05 PM, Robin Gross wrote:

As requested in our call today, below is proposed text for various parts of the draft public comment document.

Section 6.6.1.2
p. 54 add to end of (f):
"It is therefore more closely aligned with the existing structure of ICANN and in keeping ICANN rooted in the private sector."

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

-- 
Matthew Shears
Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
+ 44 (0)771 247 2987