Dear Leon,

We are almost drafting Bylawy which should be a very high level text . référence on whether the existing CCWG or another CCWG could carry out the wiorks IS THE MAXIMUM.

We do not need to enter or refer to such degree of détails.

I there is of strong believe that the part dealing with one or more SO/AC ias highlighted below is not necessary and thus should be deleted +

"by one or more Supporting Organizations or Advisory Committees"

Regards

Kavouss

2016-02-09 9:39 GMT+01:00 Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au>:

Hello Alan,

>> I cannot see having the ICANN Bylaws refer to a specific CCWG or a sub-part thereof. If they need to make a reference such as the one we are discussing, they should say the work will be carried out by an appropriately chartered, generally/widely supported, cross community working group.

Makes sense to me.

Regards,
Bruce Tonkin

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community