Hi,
Many of us argue that Human Rights is an essential component of any
definition of Public Interest. How can something be in the Public
Interest if it contravenes human rights, especially those that are
binding upon nations and obligatory for businesses, especially those
which are defined as adhering to all applicable international
law.
However, we have seen that in arriving at expression of public interest,
it is often necessary to balance those human rights, all of which stand
equal as human rights, but that have different emphasis in different
national regimes, even among those who justifiably can claim an adherence
to human rights.
As a organization, ICANN needs to adhere to human rights mandates and
needs to do so in the public interest. It is my understanding that
our bottom-up processes are the means by which we determine our
understanding of the public interest. But in doing so, we must
always be sure we do not infringe upon human rights.
Just as there are many ways to achieve stability, security and
resilience, and we determine that through our bottom-up processes, as
modulated through the advice of our experts on security and stability in
the SSAC and RSSAC, there are many ways to serve the public interest that
need to be determined through adherence to bylaws manadated bottom-up
processes and modulated through expert advice on human rights.
So perhaps we should be considering "public interest consistent with
human rights."
avri
I
On 18-Feb-15 05:15, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
Dear All,
We should avoid to be engaged doing
something that we know would no tangible
results.
I do not be infavour of replacing public interest
With anything such as human rights and
freedom Of expression, acknowledging
That the latter two issues are very important
But are quite difficult to limit public interests to
These two issues
Pls be prudent
Kavouss
Sent from my iPhone
On 17 Feb 2015, at 22:43, Edward Morris
<egmorris1@toast.net>
wrote:
I'm a bit confused
Tijani.
First, you said you didn't remember the suggestion and now you state the
suggestion had no support. As I wasn't able to be in Frankfurt I would
appreciate clarification of the status of this worthy idea. I'm
personally not a big fan of the generic term "public
interest", finding that in practice "public interest"
usually morphs into "personal interest": that is, "the
public it is I". I realise that creation of a consensus definition
of the public interest is called for in the draft 5 year OP but I do find
Robin's idea to be worthy of discussion by the wider WG and thank staff
for including it in the summary document.
Best,
Ed
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 17, 2015, at 7:09 PM, Tijani BEN JEMAA
<
tijani.benjemaa@fmai.org.tn> wrote:
Yes you did in Frankfurt, and
there was no support to your suggestion.
The “public interest” or the “benefit of the public, not just in the
interests of a particular set of stakeholders” had a large support as
part of the “CCWG Accountability – Problem definition” document (purposes
of ICANN’s accountability, d.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tijani BEN JEMAA
Executive Director
Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI)
Phone: + 216 41 649 605
Mobile: + 216 98 330 114
Fax: + 216 70 853 376
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
De : Robin Gross
[mailto:robin@ipjustice.org]
Envoyé : mardi 17 février 2015 18:40
À : Tijani BEN JEMAA
Cc : 'Adam Peake'; 'Accountability Cross Community'
Objet : Re: [CCWG-ACCT] CCWG list summary, Jan 30 to Feb
5
Yes, I made this suggestion.
Thanks,
Robin
On Feb 16, 2015, at 3:54 PM, Tijani BEN JEMAA wrote:
Dear Adam,
I may have missed some of the mails exchanged but I don’t remember that
it was suggested that the public interest be replaced by human rights and
internet freedom.
Tijani
-----Message d'origine-----
De :
accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org
[
mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] De la part
de Adam Peake
Envoyé : lundi 16 février 2015 18:45
À : Accountability Cross Community
Objet : [CCWG-ACCT] CCWG list summary, Jan 30 to Feb 5
Apologies for the delay sending this summary. It was sent to the
advisors last week.
Best,
Adam
<~WRD000.jpg>
Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant
parce que la protection Antivirus
avast! est active.
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant
parce que la protection Antivirus
avast! est active.
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community