Mathieu,

Thank you very much for message.

Yes I have noted that whenever, we very legitimately and rightly  raise shortcomings, deficiencies and non-productivity of  some of the group, the co-chairs replied that the matter yet to be discussed at the group level.

What should be discussed at the group level. We bring an issue which MUST be dealt with by hierarchy and not by the same group.

This is expressing serious concerns of the way in which the group functions and the matter must be discussed at the hierarchical level.( CCWG Plenary ).

If the Co- Chairs for their comfort decided not to take any actions in this regard we strongly object to that action. Co-chairs do not have such a right to reject a question brought to their attention by CCWG Members.

Your Colleague Leon took the same position. before to which I have contested.

I have raised an issue under agenda of your meeting and as a member of CCWG I have the full right to do so and you are bound to deal with it today.

It is many months that our time is wasted on a subject that we know the other party attempts not to have any results.

It is your duty as Co -Chair to carefully watch the progress of works, method of works, Course Of Actions Being Taken By Each Of The Nine Group

I do not approve your agenda if this issue is not dealt with today. You cannot ignore that nor escape from such a bitter reality.

Regards

Kavouss