18:30 UTC.<span></span><br><br>On Friday, September 30, 2016, Nigel Roberts &lt;<a href="mailto:nigel@channelisles.net">nigel@channelisles.net</a>&gt; wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Depends what you mean by GMT (it&#39;s often misunderstood -- GMT and UTC are the same thing).<br>
<br>
So you are technically correct (although we don&#39;t use the term GMT anymore except during the winter-time).<br>
<br>
But GMT is NOT the same as &quot;UK time&quot; - that is &quot;BST&quot; right now.<br>
<br>
So, if I understand this correctly, this will take place at 7:30 PM UK and Ireland time, and 8:30 PM in Central Europe.<br>
<br>
On 30/09/16 12:51, Paul Rosenzweig wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hearing in the case is scheduled for 130 PM Central Time (I think that is<br>
GMT -5) today ….<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Paul<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Paul Rosenzweig<br>
<br>
 &lt;mailto:<a>paul.rosenzweig@<wbr>redbranchconsulting.com</a>&gt;<br>
<a>paul.rosenzweig@<wbr>redbranchconsulting.com</a><br>
<br>
O: +1 (202) 547-0660<br>
<br>
M: +1 (202) 329-9650<br>
<br>
VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739<br>
<br>
 &lt;<a href="http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/" target="_blank">http://www.redbranchconsulti<wbr>ng.com/</a>&gt; <a href="http://www.redbranchconsulting.com" target="_blank">www.redbranchconsulting.com</a><br>
<br>
My PGP Key:  &lt;<a href="http://redbranchconsulting.com/who-we-are/public-pgp-key/" target="_blank">http://redbranchconsulting.co<wbr>m/who-we-are/public-pgp-key/</a>&gt;<br>
<a href="http://redbranchconsulting.com/who-we-are/public-pgp-key/" target="_blank">http://redbranchconsulting.com<wbr>/who-we-are/public-pgp-key/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
From: <a>accountability-cross-<wbr>community-bounces@icann.org</a><br>
[mailto:<a>accountability-cross-<wbr>community-bounces@icann.org</a>] On Behalf Of<br>
Aikman-Scalese, Anne<br>
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:06 PM<br>
To: &#39;Jonathan Zuck&#39; &lt;<a>JZuck@actonline.org</a>&gt;; Lori Schulman<br>
&lt;<a>lschulman@inta.org</a>&gt;; &#39;Raoul Plommer&#39; &lt;<a>plommer@gmail.com</a>&gt;; Martin Boyle<br>
&lt;<a>martin.boyle@nominet.uk</a>&gt;<br>
Cc: Accountability Cross Community<br>
&lt;<a>accountability-cross-<wbr>community@icann.org</a>&gt;<br>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Answers to some common questions being encountered<br>
by the ICANN staff<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Continuing Resolution passed.  Lawsuit filed in Texas:<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<a href="https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/files/epress/Net_Complaint_-_FILED.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.texasattorneygener<wbr>al.gov/files/epress/Net_<wbr>Complaint_-_FILED.pdf</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Anne E. Aikman-Scalese<br>
<br>
<br>
Of Counsel<br>
<br>
<br>
520.629.4428 office<br>
<br>
        <br>
<br>
520.879.4725 fax<br>
<br>
<br>
 &lt;mailto:<a>AAikman@lrrc.com</a>&gt; <a>AAikman@lrrc.com</a><br>
<br>
<br>
_____________________________<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP<br>
<br>
<br>
One South Church Avenue, Suite 700<br>
<br>
<br>
Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611<br>
<br>
<br>
 &lt;<a href="http://lrrc.com/" target="_blank">http://lrrc.com/</a>&gt; <a href="http://lrrc.com" target="_blank">lrrc.com</a><br>
<br>
        <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
From: Jonathan Zuck [mailto:<a>JZuck@actonline.org</a>]<br>
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 12:24 PM<br>
To: Lori Schulman; Aikman-Scalese, Anne; &#39;Raoul Plommer&#39;; Martin Boyle<br>
Cc: Accountability Cross Community<br>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Answers to some common questions being encountered<br>
by the ICANN staff<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Yes but things could still change.<br>
<br>
Jonathan Zuck<br>
President<br>
ACT|The App Association<br>
<a href="http://www.ACTonline.org" target="_blank">www.ACTonline.org</a> &lt;http://%3cbr/%<a href="http://3ewww.ACTonline.org" target="_blank">3ewww.ACTonline<wbr>.org</a>&gt;<br>
<br>
  _____<br>
<br>
From: <a>accountability-cross-<wbr>community-bounces@icann.org</a><br>
&lt;mailto:<a>accountability-cross-<wbr>community-bounces@icann.org</a>&gt;<br>
&lt;<a>accountability-cross-<wbr>community-bounces@icann.org</a><br>
&lt;mailto:<a>accountability-cross-<wbr>community-bounces@icann.org</a>&gt; &gt; on behalf of<br>
Lori Schulman &lt;<a>lschulman@inta.org</a> &lt;mailto:<a>lschulman@inta.org</a>&gt; &gt;<br>
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 1:01:16 PM<br>
To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne; &#39;Raoul Plommer&#39;; Martin Boyle<br>
Cc: <a>accountability-cross-<wbr>community@icann.org</a><br>
&lt;mailto:<a>accountability-cross-<wbr>community@icann.org</a>&gt;<br>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Answers to some common questions being encountered<br>
by the ICANN staff<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
I saw a tweet from ISOC to that effect but I don’t have confirmation.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Lori S. Schulman<br>
<br>
Senior Director, Internet Policy<br>
<br>
International Trademark Association (INTA)<br>
<br>
+1-202-704-0408, Skype: lsschulman<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
From: <a>accountability-cross-<wbr>community-bounces@icann.org</a><br>
&lt;mailto:<a>accountability-cross-<wbr>community-bounces@icann.org</a>&gt;<br>
[mailto:<a>accountability-cross-<wbr>community-bounces@icann.org</a>] On Behalf Of<br>
Aikman-Scalese, Anne<br>
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 12:48 PM<br>
To: &#39;Raoul Plommer&#39; &lt;<a>plommer@gmail.com</a> &lt;mailto:<a>plommer@gmail.com</a>&gt; &gt;; Martin<br>
Boyle &lt;<a>Martin.Boyle@nominet.uk</a> &lt;mailto:<a>Martin.Boyle@nominet.<wbr>uk</a>&gt; &gt;<br>
Cc: <a>accountability-cross-<wbr>community@icann.org</a><br>
&lt;mailto:<a>accountability-cross-<wbr>community@icann.org</a>&gt;<br>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Answers to some common questions being encountered<br>
by the ICANN staff<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
I heard the Rider preventing the IANA transition is OUT of the current<br>
Continuing Resolution.  Can Steve or Becky confirm?<br>
<br>
Anne<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Anne E. Aikman-Scalese<br>
<br>
<br>
Of Counsel<br>
<br>
<br>
520.629.4428 office<br>
<br>
        <br>
<br>
520.879.4725 fax<br>
<br>
<br>
 &lt;mailto:<a>AAikman@lrrc.com</a>&gt; <a>AAikman@lrrc.com</a><br>
<br>
<br>
_____________________________<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP<br>
<br>
<br>
One South Church Avenue, Suite 700<br>
<br>
<br>
Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611<br>
<br>
<br>
 &lt;<a href="http://lrrc.com/" target="_blank">http://lrrc.com/</a>&gt; <a href="http://lrrc.com" target="_blank">lrrc.com</a><br>
<br>
        <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
From: <a>accountability-cross-<wbr>community-bounces@icann.org</a><br>
&lt;mailto:<a>accountability-cross-<wbr>community-bounces@icann.org</a>&gt;<br>
[mailto:<a>accountability-cross-<wbr>community-bounces@icann.org</a>] On Behalf Of Raoul<br>
Plommer<br>
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 1:53 AM<br>
To: Martin Boyle<br>
Cc: <a>accountability-cross-<wbr>community@icann.org</a><br>
&lt;mailto:<a>accountability-cross-<wbr>community@icann.org</a>&gt;<br>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Answers to some common questions being encountered<br>
by the ICANN staff<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Milton, I&#39;m glad to see there&#39;s now been lots of responses to Ted Cruz&#39;s<br>
spin and hopefully this debunking will hit Trump&#39;s peddling as well. They<br>
probably won&#39;t learn to stop peddling lies but at least they&#39;ve<br>
underestimated some knowledgeable people within ICANN, who are able to<br>
describe the IANA transition in layman&#39;s terms.<br>
<br>
I learned a couple of things from that article, too.. =)<br>
<br>
-Raoul<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On 22 September 2016 at 18:37, Martin Boyle &lt;<a>Martin.Boyle@nominet.uk</a><br>
&lt;mailto:<a>Martin.Boyle@nominet.<wbr>uk</a>&gt; &gt; wrote:<br>
<br>
Sorry for the delay, Nigel.<br>
<br>
I agree with your conclusion.<br>
<br>
As you note, the .int TLD is quite well identified other than for the<br>
international databases:  there is no ambiguity in scope for organizations<br>
established by international treaties.<br>
<br>
If I have understood correctly, international databases were transferred to<br>
be included under .arpa some long time ago.<br>
<br>
Either way, I see no reason why .int should be opened up beyond<br>
organizations established by international treaty at this stage and<br>
certainly not without a properly constituted policy development process<br>
(which would need to establish a process for appointing a new operator).<br>
<br>
None of this, of course, nullifies your conclusion!<br>
<br>
Martin<br>
<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Nigel Roberts [mailto:<a>nigel@channelisles.net</a><br>
&lt;mailto:<a>nigel@channelisles.net</a><wbr>&gt; ]<br>
Sent: 16 September 2016 12:05<br>
To: Martin Boyle &lt;<a>Martin.Boyle@nominet.uk</a> &lt;mailto:<a>Martin.Boyle@nominet.<wbr>uk</a>&gt; &gt;<br>
Cc: Christopher Wilkinson &lt;<a>lists@christopherwilkinson.eu</a><br>
&lt;mailto:<a>lists@<wbr>christopherwilkinson.eu</a>&gt; &gt;;<br>
<a>accountability-cross-<wbr>community@icann.org</a><br>
&lt;mailto:<a>accountability-cross-<wbr>community@icann.org</a>&gt;<br>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Answers to some common questions being encountered<br>
by the ICANN staff<br>
<br>
The only reference is descriptive rather than policy setting. .INT predates<br>
RFC1591.<br>
<br>
It says, simply &quot;This domain is for organizations established by<br>
international treaties, or international databases&quot;. (The latter term is<br>
undefined, but includes telephony applications).<br>
<br>
You will find this text alongside all the other (at the time) existing<br>
generic domains as follows.<br>
<br>
Much of what is written below has been changed, and much of what has been<br>
changed was changed outside ICANN.<br>
<br>
I would be interested to know which policy decision classified some of the<br>
gTLDs in this list as &quot;dehors ICANN&quot;, and which within.<br>
<br>
But as two of the gTLDs described in RFC 1591 are currently extremely<br>
sensitive (MIL and GOV),from what I heard in the Senate hearing, perhaps its<br>
best not to ask for an answer to this until after the end of the month??<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
   World Wide Generic Domains:<br>
<br>
   COM - This domain is intended for commercial entities, that is<br>
         companies.  This domain has grown very large and there is<br>
         concern about the administrative load and system performance if<br>
         the current growth pattern is continued.  Consideration is<br>
         being taken to subdivide the COM domain and only allow future<br>
         commercial registrations in the subdomains.<br>
<br>
   EDU - This domain was originally intended for all educational<br>
         institutions.  Many Universities, colleges, schools,<br>
         educational service organizations, and educational consortia<br>
         have registered here.  More recently a decision has been taken<br>
         to limit further registrations to 4 year colleges and<br>
         universities.  Schools and 2-year colleges will be registered<br>
         in the country domains (see US Domain, especially K12 and CC,<br>
         below).1<br>
<br>
   NET - This domain is intended to hold only the computers of network<br>
         providers, that is the NIC and NOC computers, the<br>
         administrative computers, and the network node computers.  The<br>
         customers of the network provider would have domain names of<br>
         their own (not in the NET TLD).<br>
<br>
   ORG - This domain is intended as the miscellaneous TLD for<br>
         organizations that didn&#39;t fit anywhere else.  Some non-<br>
         government organizations may fit here.<br>
<br>
   INT - This domain is for organizations established by international<br>
         treaties, or international databases.<br>
<br>
   United States Only Generic Domains:<br>
<br>
   GOV - This domain was originally intended for any kind of government<br>
         office or agency.  More recently a decision was taken to<br>
         register only agencies of the US Federal government in this<br>
         domain.  State and local agencies are registered in the<br>
country<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Postel                                                          [Page 2]<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
RFC 1591      Domain Name System Structure and Delegation     March 1994<br>
<br>
<br>
         domains (see US Domain, below).<br>
<br>
   MIL - This domain is used by the US military.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a>Accountability-Cross-<wbr>Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/l<wbr>istinfo/accountability-cross-c<wbr>ommunity</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
  _____<br>
<br>
<br>
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the<br>
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this<br>
message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or<br>
agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended<br>
recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or<br>
copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you<br>
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by<br>
replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any<br>
attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and<br>
confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the<br>
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
  _____<br>
<br>
<br>
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the<br>
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this<br>
message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or<br>
agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended<br>
recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or<br>
copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you<br>
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by<br>
replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any<br>
attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and<br>
confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the<br>
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a>Accountability-Cross-<wbr>Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/l<wbr>istinfo/accountability-cross-c<wbr>ommunity</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a>Accountability-Cross-<wbr>Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/l<wbr>istinfo/accountability-cross-c<wbr>ommunity</a><br>
</blockquote>