Hi Jordan,

I don't think there is so much details to develop than what we currently have with the sole member (which by the way also requires a lot of details).

I think the main question we need to ask the CCWG legal is whether the leadership of the SO/AC(for instance) can indeed have legal standing under the California law. Every other aspect of MEM seem to make sense to me and just the clarity on the possibility of enforcement is what lawyers needs to come in on.

Perhaps it's also good to note that what is being proposed by board has been discussed one way or the other in the past but somehow we did not follow-up on the thoughts up.

Regards

Sent from my Asus Zenfone2
Kindly excuse brevity and typos.