Thanks too to Becky for pulling this together, and I agree with Robin that the straight comparison involved here would be v helpful.
I just have a point about one sentence of Robin's email:
"I know there is greater power for those who choose to be members under the Hybrid Model with respect to budget and strat plan, but let's play out how far we *can* get with the Empowered Designator Model? "
I think we need to clearly separate what the powers we propose are, from the degree to which they can be made to stick if anyone decides not to do what the community asks.
The powers we propose (budget, bylaws controls; removal of directors or Board) are the
same under the three models.
Under the bylaws only or voluntary model, none of the powers are enforceable in law.
Under the empowered designators model, all of the powers except budget / strat plan are enforceable in law.
Under the SO/AC empowered model, an SO or AC that opted to make the declaration could enforce any or all of the powers in law.
Whoever can or cannot enforce the bylaws as they relate to these powers, it makes no difference as to how the powers themselves work. That is, if there was a mix of statuses for different SOs and ACs, it would not change the balance of
influence we end up proposing for the actual operation of the powers.
This is an important point for us all to be super clear about as part of our working discussions - including the absolute possibility that my interpretation above isn't right (after all, I am not a lawyer...).
On 21 June 2015 at 12:16, Robin Gross <robin@ipjustice.org> wrote:
It would be useful to play both scenarios out a bit - how would we do this under the Empowered Designator model and also the Hybrid Model?
How would we craft an optimal system under both models? What would they look like? How far can we get? I know there is greater power for those who choose to be members under the Hybrid Model with respect to budget and strat plan, but
let's play out how far we *can* get with the Empowered Designator Model?
If we do this exercise in an objective and non-prejudicial manner, it would be extremely helpful to assist our group tease out the consequences, possibilities, and limitations of each scenario.
Robin
On Jun 21, 2015, at 7:27 AM, Burr, Becky wrote:
A final, important note. It appears that the same kind of mechanism could be used in the designator model context (again, with the limitations with respect to the budget and strat plan). So to the extent
that the designator model is still in play, most of the concepts weve laid out are applicable.
Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer
1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006
<Empowered SO AC PP 21 June 2015.pptx>_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
--
Jordan Carter
Chief Executive
InternetNZ
04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
jordan@internetnz.net.nz
Skype: jordancarter
A better world through a better Internet