Adding to my previous point about the escalation mechanism I have two further suggestions:
On p. 23 lines 1 and 2, the summary presents that the ICANN Board could be removed “without cause or reason”. To me, a “removal without cause”
does not necessarily seem synonymous to a “removal without reason”. Maybe someone with a US legal background could weigh in on that.
On p. 37, the bottom paragraph gives a list of WS 2 items. This seems to be incongruent with the latest version of the “Protecting and Defending
Work Stream 2” document I could find on the CCWG wiki (dating 2 November). Specifically, the item regarding ICANN interactions with governments is currently struck from the list.
Kind regards
Sabine
Von: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org]
Im Auftrag von Bernard Turcotte
Gesendet: Montag, 9. November 2015 22:42
An: Accountability Cross Community
Betreff: [CCWG-ACCT] CCWG - Executive Summary
All,
Please find attached the first full draft of the executive summary which will be discussed on the call tomorrow.
Apologies for the delay in getting this out but people have been working almost around the clock.
Bernard Turcotte
Staff Support
for the co-chairs.