Le 29 déc. 2015 à 19:05, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> a écrit :

Hi,

I am not into rushing.
And certainly not into rushing for rushing sake.

But we have committed ourselves to getting the work done and we have a
world of people waiting for us to make and end of it. We have been
slipping our schedule.  While the reasons for slipping the schedule may
be legitimate  (not always certain of that) it does not mean we haven't
slipped on promises. We continue to slip.  I think this commits us to do
our best to just keep putting one foot in front of the other and
continuing to do our best to get the work done.  That is not done by
taking a leisurely time, but is one the aided by focusing on the work
intensively.

I still think we should be considering intensive online working weekends. 

I also think it may be time for the members among us (I am not one) to
do some deciding on the issues where we still do not have full
consensus.  For example, if at the end of the intense work period in
January we are still arguing about some details, they should decide on
those issues, we should document that fact, and move on.

avri

On 29-Dec-15 12:15, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:

Yes 
Some people rush and rush.
In some of the working party meeting in the past there was about 10 participant since others could not afford that.
Multiplication if meetings and extension of their duration does not always  have good results.
We need good plan,good preparation and advance working document and establishment of priorities
Kavousd


Sent from my iPhone

On 25 Dec 2015, at 01:41, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> wrote:

Hi,

I think the intensive schedule is necessary and we will find a way if we
want to have any chance of succeeding with an IANA Transition in 2016.

I also think 3hr meetings are ok.   We might even consider one or more
of those remote weekends of meetings when they do not interfere with
people's work.

avri

On 24-Dec-15 06:58, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
Dear Mathieu
Thank you for your suggestion
As I told you at various occations, human being mental capacity should
not be overloaded.
I have participated in many conference calls since years.
Any call which lasts more than two hours was totally inefficient
Pls then reduce the duration to maximum two hours
Regards
Kavouss

2015-12-24 12:25 GMT+01:00 James Gannon <james@cyberinvasion.net
<mailto:james@cyberinvasion.net>>:

  I don’t forsee anyone who is not being compensated for their work
  being able to dedicate 6 hours from a working week to this, I
  object to rushing things and designing schedules which are
  unrealistic IMO.

  -Jg

  From: <accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org
  <mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org>> on
  behalf of Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill@afnic.fr
  <mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr>>
  Date: Thursday 24 December 2015 at 11:22 a.m.
  To: 'Accountability Cross Community'
  <accountability-cross-community@icann.org
  <mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org>>
  Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] Work plan in January

  Dear Colleagues,



  In line with the work plan discussion held on call #72, we wish to
  inform you that we have decided to increase the number of calls
  per week to two to allow for an in-depth analysis of the input
  received on our Draft Proposal, and discuss any complex requests
  for change there may be. It is currently foreseen that this
  frequency of calls will only apply to the month of January.



  As discussed on 22 December, these calls will be plenary and 
  topic-based. You will receive a list of topics in advance of the
  meetings so that you may plan your participation accordingly.



  Duration of the calls will also be extended to 3 hours to allow
  for ample time to complete our tasks. Calls will be cancelled
  (and/or duration will be reduced) if deemed unnecessary. 



  Please note that staff will send invites as well as overview of
  the conference call calendar shortly.



  We look forward to reconvening in January and wish you a happy
  holiday season for those of you who celebrate.



  Best regards

  Mathieu – Thomas - León


  _______________________________________________
  Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
  Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
  <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org>
  https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community




_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community