For the record,
I formally object against springing session on the CCWG Accountability on short notice, with the obvious effect of reducing participation.
I do however not mind if the results of the break out deliberations will be discussed on the scheduled F2F on Thursday (as the first reading), and THEREAFTER a second time on a scheduled call after being sent to the lists by Monday morning, so there is time to review them.
In any other case, please note for the record my "wildcard objection", in other words, every time a question is called (decision, consensus call, "temperature" in the room, and the like) In my absence, please note it so that there is no Broad Consensus as defined in the Charter.
el
--
Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini
Dear Colleagues,
Our next session will start at 8.30 on Oct 17, in the same room
where we were today.
There will be four breakout groups taking place in parallel in
the room, facilitated by XPLANE :
Group 1: decision-making (led
by Steve DelBianco)
Group 2: enforcement model
(led by Jordan Carter)
Group 3: removal of
individual Board directors (Mike Chartier)
Group 4: budget &
strategic plans (Jonathan Zuck)
Remote participants will form a
fifth group that will also work on budget & strategic plans
(led by Grace Abuhamad).
The terms of reference for each group are in the attached
document.
We look forward to your constructive contributions to this crucial
exercice tomorrow.
Best regards,
Thomas, Leon & Mathieu
<Terms of Ref for CCWG Breakouts.pdf>