If the CCWG Proposal is a “power grab” then it’s the sorriest excuse for one I’ve ever seen. It is almost exclusively a proposal for greater defensive rights
in reaction to ICANN Board/corporate actions, and would hardly put “vested self-interested special interests
("ICANN stakeholders" or "lobbyists")” in charge of the enterprise.
Whenever I consider China’s views on Internet matters I always recall all the websites that I could reach from the meeting rooms in Beijing but was blocked
from reaching when in my room in the venue hotel next door. That’s the Internet we don’t want.
Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/cell
Twitter: @VlawDC
"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
From: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org]
On Behalf Of Chris Disspain
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 8:38 PM
To: Accountability Cross Community (accountability-cross-community@icann.org)
Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] new blog
All,
Forwarded at the request of John Poole who cannot post to the list.
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.6140 / Virus Database: 4419/10680 - Release Date: 09/22/15