Dear Mathieu
Thanks for reply
As I mentioned two things are absolutely necessary to be discussed at today,s meeting
1 working method
2 Approach by which the draft prepared
Irrespective of lawyers certificate WE , the CCWG who wrote the text are the sole eligible entity to  
Verify the draft PARAGRAPH BY PARAGRAPH
WE ARE RESPONSIBLE TO CERTIFY ABD NOT PAID LAWYERS WHOM I FO NOT KNOW.
Read carefully the testimony which is the origin of this doubt
Regards
Kavousd
 


Sent from my iPhone

On 7 Apr 2016, at 08:26, Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill@afnic.fr> wrote:

Dear Kavouss,

 

As a reminder, we have agreed that this detailed verification will be undertaken by our lawyers, once we have answered their questions. The legal team will then provide us with a certification that the Bylaws address each of the Recommendation. We are not there yet, but getting closer.

 

Best

Mathieu

 

De : Kavouss Arasteh [mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 6 avril 2016 23:37
À : Mathieu Weill; Thomas Rickert; León Felipe Sánchez Ambía; Thomas.Schneider@bakom.admin.ch; gac@gac.icann.org; <gac-leadership@icann.org>
Cc : MSSI Secretariat; CCWG-Accountability
Objet : Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Proposed agenda for CCWG ACCT Review of Draft Bylaws Meeting | Thursday, 7 April 2016 @ 12:00 UTC

 

Dear Co -Chair,

We need to establish a working method on how to verify  the Draft Bylaws to ensure their consistencies with the corresponding Recommendations from legal and accuracy point of view$

The only way would be a paragraph by paragraph verification

Regards

Kavouss

 

2016-04-06 17:46 GMT+02:00 Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>:

Dear Co-Chairs,

On item 2 of the Agenda, you'd indicate during the call yesterday (it was also reflected in the notes) that responses to some of the questions and rationale will be provided.

I strongly suggest that these responses be provided in the next few hours (since we have exceeded a 24hrs window). It will be good that we have those drafts so some of us who may not attend (or may be audio only) can comment appropriately.

I am saying all these because it's been a practice in the past that decisions are made on second reading...

Regards
Sent from my LG G4
Kindly excuse brevity and typos

On 6 Apr 2016 1:34 p.m., "MSSI Secretariat" <mssi-secretariat@icann.org> wrote:

<image001.gif>

Dear All,

In preparation for your call CCWG Accountability Review of Draft Bylaws Meeting  – Thursday, 7 April at 12:00 – 14:00 (time converter), see below a proposed agenda:

      Proposed Agenda:

1. Opening Remarks

2. Second reading of question responses agreed on previous call

3. Resolution of remaining questions *

4. Next Steps

5. ICANN 56 - Helsinki

6.  AOB

 

* SAVE THE DATE, if needed, to complete Review of Bylaws:  Saturday, 9 April @ 04:00 (AM)UTC

 

Timeline reminder:  13 April – members of CCWG, CWG, Bylaws Coordination Group, Board and ICG to complete review of these DRAFT BYLAWS and provide feedback to legal teams

 

Documents for call:  See wiki page here

 

Adobe Connect: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/accountability/

 

Thank you!

Kind regards,

Brenda

 

 

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community


_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community