Ohh, and I wholeheartedly agree on the decision for a short thoughtful break... I think such a short break, a kit kat :) , could well be an invaluable aid to the process moving forward.
Personally, think we should agree to ban expletives in all forms on CCWG lists.
Thank you, perhaps we can move on?
RD
Generally speaking, IMHO, the co-chairs and all participating CCWG have done a magnificent job so far in the face of the complexities and difficulties.
My comment should not be read as comment on any one meeting.
I was not there.
RDOn Sep 28, 2015 9:12 AM, "Nigel Roberts" <nigel@channelisles.net> wrote:I resent the below, as I perceive it as insultingly and smugly ironic.
Mr Daniel does not appear to have been at the same meeting I was at, which, whilst I would not seek to disparage either side in the battle lines which have, apparently now been drawn, can, I feel be described as nothing less than a failure.
If that is a magnificent job, I'd hate to see a workmanlike one.
On 28/09/15 01:38, Rudolph Daniel wrote:
And a chance to justify a multistakeholder pat on the back for doing a_______________________________________________
magnificent job so far in the global public interest. ;)
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community