Dear All,
There is no intention to provide voting power to ACs .What we discussing is that they continue to provide advice in favour or against a given issue that advice is understood to be given after reaching consensus .
I do not understand some colleagues attempting to  bring new diverting points
Let us to find out how we could bring ourselves closer to each other.
This type of comments do not help
Regards
Kavouss  

2015-10-21 11:14 GMT+02:00 Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@icann.org>:
Robin’s email is the same as always. We are looking into the issue. 

From: <acct-staff-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Dr Eberhard W Lisse <epilisse@gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 at 9:59 AM
To: Robin Gross <robin@ipjustice.org>, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe@sanchez.mx>
Cc: ACCT-Staff <acct-staff@icann.org>, "wp1@icann.org" <wp1@icann.org>, Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Acct-Staff] [CCWG-ACCT] [WP1] There is no consensus on the role of Advisory Committees according to our own public comment paper which analyzed public comment

Didn't she weite she used a different email address?

el

--
Sent from Dr Lisse's iPhone 5s

On 21 Oct 2015, 09:57 +0100, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe@sanchez.mx>, wrote:
Staff,

Can you please check why some emails are not getting to the list?


Best regards,


León

El 21/10/2015, a las 9:52 a.m., Robin Gross <robin@ipjustice.org> escribió:

Resending, since my email is NOT posting to the list:

[...]

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community