I support the participation of the Board's membrés as participants of CCWG .Why they should be excluded.
ONCE AGAIN PARTICIPANTS ARE THOSE WHO ARE NOT FORMAL MEMBERS OF CCWG
Regards
Kavouss

2016-02-23 13:30 GMT+01:00 Nigel Roberts <nigel@channelisles.net>:
I do not speak to the merits of the Board's objection. There may be something of a point (or there may not).

But procedurally, it is very unfortunate.

The Board should consider whether it really wants to sink the ship over a ha'porth of tar.




On 23/02/16 12:25, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
So have your colleagues on the Board pull their objection.


el

On 2016-02-23 14:16, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" wrote:
My only recommendation to all parties is please, be flexible enough
to find a fair compromise to enable moving forward.  You have agreed
99 %.  It would be a shame if in the last minute a remaining
controversial issue blocks the historical agreement.

Wolfgang

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community