Avri,

I was very interested in your comment regarding the need to amend to provide for a community power to allow approval of any replacement IANA provider in the event of separation.  This seems to very directly concern the IANA transition itself and the prospect of securing certification of the proposal by the NTIA to Congress.

 

Could you please explain this a bit further in simple language?  Are you saying that ICG or Stewardship has specified that in the event it becomes necessary to replace PTI, then approval (or veto) of that choice should be a listed community power of the Sole Member?

 

Just seeking to understand this issue more clearly.

 

Thank you,

Anne

 

 

 

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel

Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |

One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611

(T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725

AAikman@LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com

 

 

 



This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ยง2510-2521.