Dear All,
The more we read and investigate ,the more we find almost impossible to have an agreed definition of GPI from various aspects .
There is only one refernce in Article 3 of Article of Incorporation to what GPI could cove and those are outlined in sub-section i through iv of that Article.
Those sub-section could form some sort of GPI SESCRIPTION and /or scope of application and NOTGPI definition . Those sub-sections are narrow refernce to specific area of GPI in ICANN activities.
In the light of the foregoing, rejection of any Recommendation or part of the Recommendation contained in CCWG 3rd Proposal SHALL BE CLEARLY AND SPECIFICALLY ASSOCIATED with any of those sub-section with valid argument and legal analysis. Consequently by simple statement that " such REC. OR PART OF THE rec. is inconsistent with GPI is not convincing at all.
Regards
Kavouss