Thanks for that Chris, it wasn’t clear on my initial read that was the case.
-James

From: Chris Disspain
Date: Friday 2 October 2015 12:03
To: James Gannon
Cc: "avri@acm.org", "accountability-cross-community@icann.org"
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] FW: Continued Counsel Dialogue

And, let me say again…the memo was sent to your lawyers, not to the Board.



Cheers,


Chris


On 2 Oct 2015, at 21:00 , James Gannon <james@cyberinvasion.net> wrote:

Agreed Avri and that was chat promoted me to respond to be honest, I don’t feel that this kind of tone is helpful to the board members trying to understand our proposal.

-James




On 02/10/2015 11:53, "accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org on behalf of Avri Doria" <accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org on behalf of avri@acm.org> wrote:

Hi,

On 02-Oct-15 06:10, James Gannon wrote:
be unnecessarily aggressive and accusatory in its tone

We need to remember that this was the release of a document created for
the Board.  It was probably not written for our eyes. I am grateful we
were allow this peek behind the curtain.

What is interesting to me is the realization that if the Board is fed a
steady diet of such legal advice, it becomes easy to understand the hard
line positions they take.

avri



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community