Dear Kavouss

You have a 100% perfect right to find parts of the new By-Laws unacceptable, and I should defend to the death your right to say so; however  you are, it seems to me, now tilting at windmills at this late stage. (I find the restriction of ICANN's committment to human rights to 'applicable law' (of which there is none) to be equally unacceptable.)

However, it is what it is.

The train has left the station. Elvis has left the building.

If you could suggest any procedural method about which 'unacceptable' parts of the proposed Draft Bylaws could be objected to and changed at this phase in their adoption, I would be delighted to hear it.

On the other hand, perhaps we should just take whatever gains we have made to dayte, and carry on the good work within WS2??


Nigel

On 26/05/16 08:37, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:

This is a totally unacceptable proposal.

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community