I am trying to get to a concrete and shared understanding of what this proposal means when it says "services." Based on the varying responses in this and earlier threads, we're not there yet.

Greg

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Nigel Roberts <nigel@channelisles.net> wrote:

I agree with Prof. Müller.

We must endeavour to be technology and implementation neutral despite the fact that ICANN is built on a specific, Port 53, protocol.

On 11/11/2015 06:19 PM, Mueller, Milton L wrote:

Greg:

Alas, it is not an accurate formulation. It is far too specific, invokes
technologies that may be superseded or not conform to future
architectures, etc. What does it mean to regulate a “web server” anyway?

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community