Dear All,

I am not comfortable with Steve proposal or his comrpomise.

Perhaps we could work on some thing else.

I have added another alternative : STATUS QUO and SUPPRESSION OF ST18 which in fact was invented by somebody and pushed through a working party and then CCWG

Once again , 2/3 Majority for GAC Advice may encourage GAC to ACCEPT ST18.

This is an important elemebnt

Pls carefully consider that before GAC totally exclude that

Kavouss

2016-01-30 3:13 GMT+01:00 Paul Rosenzweig <paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com>:

Mr. Brunner-Williams

I don't even understand your question. Perhaps you are too smart for me.

But to be clear I make no defense of the .Africa decision, nor a critique. I only note that the decision makes it clear that the GAC through its process did intervene.

--
Paul Rosenzweig
Sent from myMail app for Android
Friday, 29 January 2016, 08:58PM -05:00 from "Eric (Maule) Brunner-Williams" <ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net>:

Mr. Rosenzweig,

Is it your representation that something _must_ have occured prior to the
GAC members severally and/or collectively arriving at a view on the merits
of an application? If so, what please?

[Mr. Rosenzweig's spirited defense of the DCA Trust application for .africa
omitted.]

Eric Brunner-Williams
Eugene, Oregon