I oppose to that wrong statement as these are four distinct communities.
Kavouss

Sent from my iPhone

On 1 Aug 2015, at 02:16, Sébastien Bachollet <sebastien@bachollet.com> wrote:

Thanks Bernard,
Following Thomas suggestion

i. raise your concern

I would like to reiterate my proposal regarding

·       First, to remove confusion about the meaning of “private sector” in the ICANN Bylaws, we propose to expressly state that the private sector includes business stakeholders, civil society, the technical community and academia.

ii. provide a rationale for your concern

It is not the image of the current multistakeholder organization within ICANN.

iii. please offer an alternative suggestion


To be change by

·       First, to remove confusion about the meaning of “private sector” in the ICANN Bylaws, we propose to expressly state that the private sector includes business providers, business users, individual end-users, civil society, academia and the technical community.

Sébastien Bachollet
+33 6 07 66 89 33
Blog: http://sebastien.bachollet.fr/
Mail: Sébastien Bachollet <sebastien@bachollet.com>

De : <accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard@gmail.com>
Date : vendredi 31 juillet 2015 18:30
À : Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community@icann.org>
Objet : [CCWG-ACCT] CCWG - Final clean of mission and core values from Becky

Attached in Word and PDF.

Contains HR wording agreed to today.

May need some formatting.

Cheers.

B.
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community