Generally speaking, "staff driven" means to the community "thoroughly discredited", never mind that aspirations from staff are just that, asprirations.
I do not wonder how this slipped past the Board, it probably probably was part of the consent agenda, but the sheer audacity of it makes it belong to CCWG-Accountability, by default.
Substance can of course be discussed at IG or wherever, as well.
el
--
Sent from Dr Lisse's iPhone 6
Adding the endorsement of NetMundial principles to the Strat Plan is staff driven, not yet fully supported by the ICANN community. this should be referred to the CCWG-IG, not debated in either IANA or Accountability WGs. We should consider this aspirational on the part of ICANN staff.
I appreciate your pointing this out, Rahul.
Sent from my iPad
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/strategic-plan-2016-2020-10oct14-en.pdf Page 22, Section 4.3 Participate in the evolution of a global, trusted, inclusive multistakeholder
Internet governance ecosystem that addresses Internet issues.
One of the key success factors says:
Demonstrate leadership by implementing best practices in
multistakeholder mechanisms within the distributed Internet
governance ecosystem while encouraging all stakeholders to
implement the principles endorsed at NETmundial.
Related questions:
- Should a body like ICANN define and adopt Internet Principles it believes in, for its policy, strategy and operations?
- Are group members aware whether endorsement of NETmundial principles is through a public consultation process involving community or an internal ICANN decision? Is this a matter that this group working on ICANN Accountability should discuss?
Kind Regards,
Rahul Sharma