From: <accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Jordan Carter <jordan@internetnz.net.nz>
Date: Monday 11 April 2016 at 4:47 a.m.
To: "Mueller, Milton L" <milton@gatech.edu>
Cc: "accountability-cross-community@icann.org" <accountability-cross-community@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] ICANN doesn't "allocate" or "assign" beyond the root (was Re: CCWG - Proposed Responses to questions on Draft Bylaws)

I agree with Andrew and Milton et al.

Jordan

On 11 April 2016 at 15:17, Mueller, Milton L <milton@gatech.edu> wrote:

Agree 100%, this really is a mission-critical issue, to coin a phrase. This is not a quibble over phrasing.

> -----Original Message-----
> The current bylaw language quite clearly says not only that ICANN can make
> such a rule, but that making rules of this sort is part of ICANN's mission. By
> restricting the policy making throughout the tree to the contractual
> relationships ICANN actually has, we stop making this about where in the DNS
> the name appears and turn it into a normal contractual obligation. This gets
> away from the notion of ICANN-as-regulator.
>

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

Jordan Carter

Chief Executive
InternetNZ

+64-4-495-2118 (office) | +64-21-442-649 (mob) | Skype: jordancarter
jordan@internetnz.net.nz | www.internetnz.nz

A better world through a better Internet