Hi Jordan,
Great that you had a go at that and I realize all too well that it is much easier to comment on work done than to actually do the work.
That said, may I suggest you rethink some of the descriptions for the colors. As an example: for green you write “more preferred” and the Sole MM gets a green for “all [powers] directly enforceable”. I think our discussions show (most recently yesterday afternoon) that not everyone agrees that having all powers directly legally enforceable is the "more preferred" option.
A solution can be to “objectify” the description: green just becomes “maximum direct enforceability”, orange becomes “less direct enforceability"
Cheers,
Roelof
From: <accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Jordan Carter <jordan@internetnz.net.nz>
Date: dinsdag 20 oktober 2015 14:30
To: Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Draft Table to compare Sole Des and Sole Mem
Hi all
I have had a go at filling out some of the comparison table circulated yesterday, hopefully non-controversially.
Encourage your review if you have a quiet moment and maybe suggest you add some thoughts if you feel confident in doing so?
cheersJordan
On 19 October 2015 at 18:51, Jordan Carter <jordan@internetnz.net.nz> wrote:
Hi all
As mentioned in the AC room chat, I've drafted a table based on what Mathieu set out in the slide - bringing together criteria for assessing the two "Sole" models.
It's a google doc here: <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Bu6ze45ONESJyO_f3RCpEafQsb1VAPgCFHtmWsNIIoM/edit?usp=sharing>
PDF and Word docs attached.
In thinking about these criteria, I'd urge a look back at our Counsel's work on comparing the two models. Also attached.
This might be up for review and then we might use it on Wednesday.
Feedback welcome!
cheersJordan
--
Jordan Carter
Chief Executive
InternetNZ
Web: www.internetnz.nz
A better world through a better Internet