All,

Malcolm confirmed his issue was around all the N/A's in the summary sheets in columns D, E and F.

This is to be expected.  As the overarching title of these three columns states "If no survey response - staff assessment".

As such if there was a response given in the survey monkey these columns are not filled in and contain N/A (almost 57% of responses used the survey).

Additionally if the survey monkey form was not used and a respondent did not comment on a recommendation those columns will also contain N/A (there were quite a few of these also).

Hope this clears up any misconceptions.

Cheers.

B.

On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Malcolm Hutty <malcolm@linx.net> wrote:
I'm also a bit confused by the prevalence of "N/A".

There seem to be a great many cases where the respondent writes "We
support this recommendation and ... (think/stress X,Y,Z)" where the item
is marked as "N/A" in the support/disagreement columns.

But it looks as though surveymonkey and direct replies may have been
counted separately.

Nor is it at all clear on what basis some replies have been picked out
for "analysis", but not others.

Perhaps the staff could give more of an explanation as to how this was
constructed?

Thanks,

Malcolm.

On 06/01/2016 16:44, Schaefer, Brett wrote:
> Alice,
>
>
>
> Thank you for this. The Heritage Foundation’s opposition to full GAC
> participation in the empowered community was not noted in the Rec 1
> analysis. As stated in our comment, we think that GAC should be strictly
> advisory.
>
>
>
> On Rec 7 analysis, I’m concerned that our position may be misunderstood.
> We support including DIDP in an appeals process, but we are very much
> against restricting it to the engagement, escalation, and enforcement
> staircase because that process is dependent on the Empowered Community.
> DIDP appeals need to be accessible to everyone, not just the SOACs, and
> appeals should not require SOAC approval at any threshold. This may
> require moving DIDP appeals to the request for reconsideration process.
>
>
>
> On Rec 11, the one sentence summary gives the impression that we support
> Rec 11. We do not and offered specific proposals on how to change the
> text to address our concerns, which were not included in the Rec 11
> analysis.
>
>
>
> Best wishes,
>
>
>
> Brett
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> BrettSchaefer
> Jay Kingham Senior Research Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs
> Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom Davis Institute for National
> Security and Foreign Policy
> The Heritage Foundation
> 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
> Washington, DC 20002
> 202-608-6097
> heritage.org <http://heritage.org/>
>
> *From:*accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org
> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] *On Behalf Of
> *Alice Jansen
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 06, 2016 9:04 AM
> *To:* accountability-cross-community@icann.org
> *Subject:* [CCWG-ACCT] On behalf of Co-Chairs - Public comment
> summary/analysis
>
>
>
> _On behalf of CCWG-ACCT Co-Chairs_
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> Attached to this email you will find a staff produced summary and
> analysis of the public comments received on our Draft Proposal.
>
> In preparation for our January discussions, we encourage you to read the
> document as well as comments available for full reference
> at: http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/.
> Note: a /download all/ page is available
> at https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=56984613
>
> Please note that we cannot convert the spreadsheet into a PDF, the tabs
> and spreadsheet being too large. Thank you for your understanding.
>
> Staff will post the summary on the public forum box on Friday, 8 January
> - https://www.icann.org/public-comments/draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-2015-11-30-en.
> In the meantime, it is located on your wiki
> at https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=56984613
>
>
>
> Thank you
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
>
>
> Mathieu, Thomas, León
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>

--
            Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523
   Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog
 London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/

                 London Internet Exchange Ltd
       Monument Place, 24 Monument Street, London EC3R 8AJ

         Company Registered in England No. 3137929
       Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA


_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community