From Finn, circulated with permission:

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Finn Petersen <FinPet@erst.dk> wrote:

Arun,

 

The Danish position has not changed.

 

In the email you attach we said “From our (DK) point of view we fully understand the need to have a stress test for such a situation, including mitigating capture, but it is our general view that any such proposal should not lower the current threshold for the obligation of the ICANN Board to duly taking into account GAC advice.”

 

According to ST 18 the ICANN Board has only to try, in good faith and in a timely and efficient manner, to find a mutually acceptable solution, when GAC advice is supported by consensus. The ICANN Board has always to duly take account of GAC advice – also advices that are not supported by consensus in the GAC.

 

Hope this helps? If you have further questions, do not hesitate to contact me. If you would like to know more about the Danish position on ST 18, please read the transcripts from the GAC meetings.

 

Looking forward to the correction.

 

Best,

 

Finn

 

 

Fra: Arun Mohan Sukumar [mailto:arun.sukumar@orfonline.org]
Sendt: 27. oktober 2015 18:15
Til: Finn Petersen
Cc: Accountability Cross Community
Emne: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] On Stress Test 18

 

Hi Finn, this is what I went by: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp1/2015-March/000071.html

 

If the Danish position has changed, happy to correct.

 

Best,


-- 

Head, Cyber Initiative

Observer Research Foundation, New Delhi

+91-9871943272

 

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Finn Petersen <FinPet@erst.dk> wrote:

Dear Arun,

 

Thoughts - here is one!

 

You write "Several countries, notably Brazil, Spain, Denmark and Argentina, see the proposed modification as unacceptable."

 

Why did you include Denmark in the group of countries that oppose ST18  - your statement concerning Denmark is wrong!!!!

 

Please correct this.

 

Best,

 

Finn, GAC - Dk

Sendt fra min iPad


Den 27. okt. 2015 kl. 17.42 skrev "arun.sukumar@orfonline.org" <arun.sukumar@orfonline.org>:

CCWGers, plugging here a post I wrote on discussions around Stress Test 18. 

 

Thoughts welcome!

 

Best,

Arun

Sent from my iPad

 

Head, Cyber Initiative

Observer Research Foundation, New Delhi

Ph: +91-9871943272 

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community