I can state with absolute truthfulness and certainty that there was no pre-alignment or pre-arrangement. I resent the allegation and I'm disappointed in the thinking underlying such a  statement.

People agreed with me because they shared my opinion, which is not in any way intended to be US-centric.  If this were a UK-law document, I would say the same thing -- that we should use terms commonly used and with settled meanings under UK law.  I think it's a common sense position.

Can we get back to business and avoid hatching conspiracy theories?  Such thinking is below the standard set by my esteemed colleague from Iran.

Greg 😈

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 9:54 AM, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe@sanchez.mx> wrote:

Dear Kavouss,

 

I cannot jump into concluding that there is any kind of pre-arrangement against your views.

 

The fact that as you state “others had no comments” was what led me to believe there was no traction to the issue and hence I suggested taking it to the list.

 

 

Best regards,

 

 

León

 

El 12/04/2016, a las 8:51 a.m., Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> escribió:

 

Dear Leon

Tks

Having no traction was due to lineup ?pre arrangement of those talked against me 

Others had no comments

Regards

Kavouss 

 

2016-04-12 15:40 GMT+02:00 León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe@sanchez.mx>:

Dear Kavouss,

I am sorry you feel that way. As you know, our duty as Co-Chairs is to try to facilitate the discussion amongst all members and participants in our group.

I am aware that you have expressed your disagreement with Mr. Shatan’s views in several occasions but I am also aware that, to the best of my knowledge, your disagreement has found no traction in the discussion in the meeting you are referring to, hence I thought the best way to foster and encourage discussion on the issue was to take it to the list.

I apologize if my suggestion offended you or if it was perceived as being disrespectful. Of course I didn’t mean it that way at all.

I trust you will understand why I suggested to take the discussion to the list and thank you for your kind observation.


Best regards,


León

> El 12/04/2016, a las 6:54 a.m., Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> escribió:
>
> Dear Leon
> I am disappointed and frustrated by the reaction of some Co-Chairs in conducting the meeting .
> I had a disagreement with Mr. Satan of IPC on the above subject
> Due to the closed link between that person and   other  persons belonging  to the same camp, you did not agreed with the argument that I submitted .
> Mr.Satan and his camp , wrong views were taken BUT what disturbed me more was your statement in saying" kavouss,if you want to continue thus discussion,continue on nailing list"
> Why should I do that?
> What was the usefulness of the meeting if an important issue should be discussed outside the call?
> Why I was treated ?
> .
> Kavousd
> Sent from my iPhone

 

 

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community