I looked at the updated memo comparing the different community empowerment models on the flight back from Buenos Aires and just wondered whether I missed (or simply misunderstood) something during
our third BA working session comparing the empowered SO/AC membership resp. designator model. I had taken away from that working session the impression that the designator model might give us (in principle) all necessary community powers. But checking back
with the chart in annex A of the attached legal memo I’m not quite so sure. In the very bottom of the chart the memo looks at the power to bind the board to implement IANA Function Review Recommendations (CWG dependency) and states that in a designator model
only a reconsideration right would be viable but with limits on how often this could be done and not being ultimately binding. An approval and reconsideration right would only be viable in a membership model. Wouldn’t this CWG dependency influence our choice
of model? Or this there another way to “solve” this dependency that I have simply missed?
Best regards,
Sabine
Von: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org]
Im Auftrag von Mathieu Weill
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2015 09:11
An: accountability-cross-community@icann.org
Cc: Holly Gregory; Rosemary E. Fei; Hofheimer, Joshua T.
Betreff: [CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: Re: [Acct-Legal] Memo - Revised Powers Chart, Voluntary Model
Dear Colleagues,
Attached is the updated memo from Sidley on the viability of the various powers in each model under study. The package of documents for the F2F meeting will be updated accordingly.
Best
Mathieu
-------- Message transféré --------
|
Sujet : |
Re: [Acct-Legal] Memo - Revised Powers Chart, Voluntary Model |
|
Date : |
Tue, 16 Jun 2015 18:12:09 +0000 |
|
De : |
Hofheimer, Joshua T.
<jhofheimer@sidley.com> |
|
Pour : |
'ccwg-accountability5@icann.org'
<ccwg-accountability5@icann.org> |
|
Copie à : |
Sidley ICANN CCWG
<sidleyicannccwg@sidley.com>, 'ICANN-Adler'
<ICANN@adlercolvin.com> |
Dear Legal Sub-Team,
Attached is revised draft of the memo submitted in the prior email describing the viability of the enumerated powers under the three models – Member model, Designator model and “Voluntary Collaborationâ€
model (name of third model not settled). This memo responds to questions that came in from the CCWG upon reviewing the prior document. For your convenience, a clean and redline against the June 10 memo are attached.
Thank you,
Josh
JOSHUA HOFHEIMER
Partner
Sidley Austin LLP
+1.213.896.6061
jhofheimer@sidley.com
From: Hofheimer, Joshua T.
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 9:10 PM
To: ccwg-accountability5@icann.org
Cc: Sidley ICANN CCWG; ICANN-Adler
Subject: Memo - Revised Powers Chart, Voluntary Model
Dear Legal Sub-Team,
Further to the CCWG request on the call last Friday, attached is a memo revising the summary chart describing the viability of the enumerated powers under the three models – Member
model, Designator Model and Voluntary Model. We also explore the impact of not having the SO/ACs organized legal persons to represent their interests.
Cheers,
Josh
JOSHUA HOFHEIMER
Sidley Austin LLP
+1.213.896.6061 (LA direct)
+1.650.565.7561 (PA direct)
+1.323.708.2405 (cell)
jhofheimer@sidley.com
www.sidley.com
SIDLEY
AUSTIN LLP
From:
ccwg-accountability5-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ccwg-accountability5-bounces@icann.org]
On Behalf Of Hilton, Tyler
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 8:29 PM
To: ccwg-accountability5@icann.org
Subject: [Acct-Legal] Memo - Responses to CCWG GAC Questions
Dear Legal Sub-team,
Attached please find a memo responding to the list of questions from the Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) provided to us on June 5, 2015.
Best,
TYLER HILTON
Associate
Sidley Austin LLP
555 West Fifth Street
Los Angeles, CA 90013
+1.213.896.6130
thilton@sidley.com
www.sidley.com
SIDLEY
AUSTIN LLP
****************************************************************************************************
This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us
immediately.
****************************************************************************************************