Dear Co-Chairs,
Though I stand my ground here, I find Mr Arasteh's suggestion
helpful.
greetings, el
On 2015-04-21 10:49, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:Dear ThomasThank you in confirming that the minority position could bereflected in the reportWhatt you are saying is ,at this stage, we are not formulating anyconsensus on any issue. Just we are submitting a preliminaryoutput on which there is been no attempt for consensus .Then THISNON Consensus status of the document SHOULD BE EXPLICITLYREFLECTED IN THE DOCUMENT SENT FOR PUBKLIC COMMENT.RegradsKavouss2015-04-21 10:33 GMT+02:00 Thomas Rickert <rickert@anwaelte.de<mailto:rickert@anwaelte.de>>:Dear Kavouss and Eberhard,the e-mails that have been exchanged on this all need to be read incontext. In summary:- There will be the opportunity to file minority statements when theCCWG publishes consensus recommendations it has worked on.- The CCWG is now in a phase where interim findings will bepresented to the community for input. These are not consensusrecommendations. The chairs have not determined the consensus levelin the group.- In the absence of a consensus determination, the rules of theCharter are not applicable at this stage.I hope this clarifies the situation.Thomas---rickert.net <http://rickert.net>_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community