Dear Steve,

Thanks for the proposal.

I would rephrase the following sentence "The CCWG is considering whether bylaws Article 18 Section 1 should be among the bylaws sections listed as “Fundamental Bylaws”, which would thereby require positive approval by Members/Designators."

to the following, just to be clear we are considering two options:

"The CCWG is considering whether bylaws Article 18 Section 1 should keep its current status or be among the bylaws sections listed as “Fundamental Bylaws”. In the latter case, any changes to it  would require positive approval by Members/Designators.  "

Note: native speakers (and others) should feel free to optimize the language.

Regards,

Secretário Pedro Ivo Ferraz da Silva

Divisão da Sociedade da Informação (DI)

Ministério das Relações Exteriores - Brasil

T: + 55 61 2030-6609

Secretary Pedro Ivo Ferraz da Silva

Division of Information Society (DI)

Ministry of External Relations - Brazil

T: + 55 61 2030-6609

-----Mensagem original-----
De: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] Em nome de Steve DelBianco
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 24 de abril de 2015 12:38
Para: accountability-cross-community@icann.org
Assunto: [CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: draft proposal for AoC section 8 - for our next call

Per Mathieu's request, here is a one page summary of proposed way to deal with AoC section 8.  I tried to reflect suggestions from our last call.

Look forward to discussion.

—

Steve DelBianco

Executive Director

NetChoice

http://www.NetChoice.org <http://www.netchoice.org/>  and  http://blog.netchoice.org <http://blog.netchoice.org/> 

+1.703.615.6206