Hi Alan,
_should_ was meant to indicate it is not mandatory. We could specify that the NomCom, should it have qualified candidates available, put up at least two Board members. Let others do the wordsmithing.
Idea being:
- NomCom is not forced to provide candidates if they do not have any
- if they have some, they should give at least two, max 8
I am glad Holly responded to Sam's concern.
Are we good to go?
Thomas
How can we do that? At any given time, they may not have an Board names
in reserve. Alan
At 23/07/2015 03:50 PM, Thomas Rickert wrote:
I suggest we say NomCom shall
not put up less than two.
That should give enough flexibility to cover all wishes that were brought
forward.
Thomas
========
rickert.net
PS - Sent from my cell. Please excuse typos and brevity.
Am 23.07.2015 um 20:41 schrieb Greg Shatan
<gregshatanipc@gmail.com
>:
I think this point has moved on
a bit, based on the call earlier today. The NomCom will not be
putting up alternates. I believe where we are now is that the
NomCom will (in the event of a spill) put up at least two and possibly up
to eight interim directors at that time. I'm not sure but they may
have the option of not putting up directors at all, but I think that did
not come out on top in the call.
NomCom gets more good candidates than they nominate, so there is a pool
from which to draw on, should the time ever come.
I think this is right or close to it, but the next draft should clear
this up.
Greg
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Seun Ojedeji
<seun.ojedeji@gmail.com
> wrote:
- I agree with this as well, although I thought there was clear
direction on this subject in Paris.
- Regards
- Sent from Google nexus 4
- kindly excuse brevity and typos.
- On 23 Jul 2015 7:23 pm, "Cherine Chalaby"
<
cherine.chalaby@icann.org> wrote:
- I agree. It does not make sense to ask NomCom to nominate
alternates. Cherine
- On 23 Jul 2015, at 15:23, Marilyn Cade
<marilynscade@hotmail.com
> wrote:
- I agree with not asking the NomCom to put up alternates. Spilling the
Board should be so exceptional and a smaller exe board should be able to
then launch a process, which could result in both elections and in
appointments.
- M
- > Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 12:13:13 +0100
- > From:
malcolm@linx.net
- > To:
jordan@internetnz.net.nz;
wp1@icann.org;
accountability-cross-community@icann.org
- > Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] [WP1] updated paper: Recall of the
ICANN Board
- >
- >
- > On 23/07/2015 11:18, Jordan Carter wrote:
- > > See my edits in the files beginning with 2015-07-23.
- >
- > One comment: I thought the general view in Paris was that NomCom
would
- > not nominate members of an interim Board. I doubt the
practicality of
- > requiring it to do so.
- >
- > That seems to have changed; perhaps I missed some discussion.
Or
- > misperceived the general view.
- >
- > Requiring NomCom to put up alternates at the AGM creates the
"people
- > standing in the shadows waiting for a chance" that were
mentioned as a
- > prospect to be avoided, and was accepted as a reason for not
requiring
- > SOs and ACs to nominate alternates with every appointment.
- >
- > Moreover, how will NomCom find people willing to commit to
drop
- > everything and become an interim director in the unlikely event
of a
- > Board spill, knowing that it is highly unlikely this will ever
come to
- > pass?
- >
- > It is surely much easier to ask someone "Will you agree to
serve as a
- > director now?" than "Will you agree to serve as a
director in an
- > unspecified number of months, should some very unlikely event
come to
- > pass?".
- >
- > For these reasons, I think that excusing NomCom from nominating
interim
- > directors is a better choice.
- >
- > --
- > Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44
20 7645 3523
- > Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog
- > London Internet Exchange |
http://publicaffairs.linx.net/
- >
- > London Internet Exchange Ltd
- > 21-27 St Thomas Street, London SE1 9RY
- >
- > Company Registered in England No. 3137929
- > Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA
- >
- >
- > _______________________________________________
- > Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
- >
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
- >
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
- _______________________________________________
- Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
-
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
-
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
- _______________________________________________
- Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
-
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
-
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
- _______________________________________________
- Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
-
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
-
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________
WP1 mailing list
WP1@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1
_______________________________________________
WP1 mailing list
WP1@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1