Agreed.

Keith

From: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Burr, Becky
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 4:51 PM
To: Seun Ojedeji; Mueller, Milton L
Cc: accountability-cross-community@icann.org
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Recommendation 11, 2/3 board threshold, GAC consensus, and finishing

And we need to preserve the community’s ability to challenge the Board’s implementation of GAC Advice, which is what my proposal is intended to do.

J. Beckwith Burr
Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel & Chief Privacy Officer
1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington D.C. 20006
Office: +1.202.533.2932 Mobile: +1.202.352.6367 / neustar.biz

From: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>
Date: Friday, January 29, 2016 at 4:48 PM
To: "Mueller, Milton L" <milton@gatech.edu>
Cc: "Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch" <Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch>, Accountability Community <accountability-cross-community@icann.org>, Becky Burr <becky.burr@neustar.biz>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Recommendation 11, 2/3 board threshold, GAC consensus, and finishing

On 29 Jan 2016 10:11 p.m., "Mueller, Milton L" <milton@gatech.edu> wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> >
> > Isn't it so that any guidance or PDP adopted by 2/3 by the GNSO must be
> > adopted by the Board?
>
> No, it is not. The GAC has routinely interfered with and altered GNSO guidance via its "advice."
>
SO: Actually if this is true, I don't think its right to say GAC did this but rather that board made this happen. We cannot have a board that does not have option to decide independently be it on GAC advice/ALAC's or any other policy outcome of an SO. As far as I am concerned, the most neutral part of this community remains the board and they require adequate means of exercising that role.

Regards
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community