Hi Jordan,

Great that you had a go at that and I realize all too well that it is much easier to comment on work done than to actually do the work.

That said, may I suggest you rethink some of the descriptions for the colors. As an example: for green you write “more preferred” and the Sole MM gets a green for “all [powers] directly enforceable”. I think our discussions show (most recently yesterday afternoon) that not everyone agrees that having all powers directly legally enforceable is the "more preferred" option.

A solution can be to “objectify” the description: green just becomes “maximum direct enforceability”, orange becomes “less direct enforceability"

Cheers,

Roelof

From: <accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Jordan Carter <jordan@internetnz.net.nz>
Date: dinsdag 20 oktober 2015 14:30
To: Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Draft Table to compare Sole Des and Sole Mem

Hi all

I have had a go at filling out some of the comparison table circulated yesterday, hopefully non-controversially.

Encourage your review if you have a quiet moment and maybe suggest you add some thoughts if you feel confident in doing so?

cheers
Jordan

On 19 October 2015 at 18:51, Jordan Carter <jordan@internetnz.net.nz> wrote:
Hi all

As mentioned in the AC room chat, I've drafted a table based on what Mathieu set out in the slide - bringing together criteria for assessing the two "Sole" models.


PDF and Word docs attached.

In thinking about these criteria, I'd urge a look back at our Counsel's work on comparing the two models. Also attached.

This might be up for review and then we might use it on Wednesday.


Feedback welcome!

cheers
Jordan




--
Jordan Carter

Chief Executive 
InternetNZ

+64-4-495-2118 (office) | +64-21-442-649 (mob)
Email: jordan@internetnz.net.nz 
Skype: jordancarter

A better world through a better Internet