I agree with Avri. Further, Board B seems to become some kind of mutant hybrid of Board and management, which should be different roles.

While we can always explore it fully (within some sense of time constraints), I would not see much mileage in doing so.

Greg

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> wrote:

Hi,

I have never understood the appeal of such a model. To me it seems like twice as much Board to worry about in an environment of never really knowing where the ultimate responsibility lay.

avri

On 19-Feb-15 13:00, Mr R.T. Daniel wrote:

Thinking out loud.
So is there any mileage in having an icann A & icann B.
"A" board = public interest & contract co.
"B" board private non profit implementing Board A 's ..policy frameworks....etc...etc..
Board B answerable to board A?
RD

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community