Dear Jordan,
Welcome back to the scene.
Now there are three different interpretations of Designator
1. From Bruce
2. From Grec and few others
3 .From Jordan
See the corresponding messages from these three distinguished colleagues
In my view the third one is more close to the reality ( the manner in which community powers are described in all three CCWG proposals
However, we need to have the views of the Lawyers and consensus agreement of CCWG
Regards
Kavouss
One wonders why one doesn't call it Sole Designator.
el
On 2016-01-26 06:42, Greg Shatan wrote:
> Recommendation 1 states:
>
> . The entity created using the Sole Designator model will be
> referred to as the “Empowered Community.” (Summary, Page 1,
> bullet point 3).
>
> In other words the Sole Designator is the Empowered Community, and
> vice versa. You are introducing a dichotomy where none exists.
>
> Greg
>
[...]
--
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
el@lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421 \ /
Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community