Hi,

Further, there may be real benefit in defining the ICANN Community as a legal entity in that it would give SOAC a separate visibility as the entity that ICANN corporate is accountable to.

The more I think about it, the appealing it seems.

From the ATRT perspective, we would need to explore whether it would require any modification to the AOC- bylaw import. Partly this would depend on what sort of internal structure the ICANN SOAC entity adopted and what powers it held.

avri

On 22-Apr-15 09:09, Avri Doria wrote:

Hi,

On 22-Apr-15 08:26, Roelof Meijer wrote:

2)

What I find quite frustrating is that I have raised the point of the possibility (or not) of a single membership structure – an option mentioned by Sidley and Adler & Colving in their legal advice – several times by now without getting any substantial reaction. I am not aware that any serious effort to investigate this has led to a formal write-off.

In some way that might lessen the complexity of making most SOAC an individual legal entity.

How would it work? Would we continue to appoint Directors just as we do now?

Or would there need to be some sort of Members Council that took actions, working simliarly to the the executive board or community council idea?

thanks

avri

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com