On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 01:26:36PM +0100, Malcolm Hutty wrote:
> What if the reason for rejecting the budget/plan is that ICANN failed to
> hold a public comment period?

That seems like it'd be a pretty good rationale to me.  No?

Yes it is but there would have been no opportunity to submit it to public comment. I guess that was the point Malcom was trying to make (unless i missed his point)

Cheers!
 
A

--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community



--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seun Ojedeji,
Federal University Oye-Ekiti
web:      http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
Mobile: +2348035233535
alt email: seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng

Bringing another down does not take you up - think about your action!