Chris, thanks for forwarding.  This will be helpful input as we continue working towards a consensus recommendation.   Regards, Keith

From: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Chris Disspain
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 7:51 AM
To: CCWG Accountability
Cc: John Curran
Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: Designator-based Empowered SO/AC model
Importance: High

All,

FYI from John Curran.

Cheers,

Chris

Begin forwarded message:

From: John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>

Subject: Designator-based Empowered SO/AC model

Date: 25 June 2015 19:40:43 AEST

To: Milton L Mueller <mueller.syr.edu@gmail.com>, Becky Burr <Becky.Burr@neustar.biz>, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.co>, Chris Disspain <ceo@auda.org.au>, Athina Fragkouli <athina.fragkouli@ripe.net>

Milton, Becky, Seun, Chris, Athina -

   Please excuse the widespread nature of this email, but I am not a “participant”
   of the CCWG and thus must seek an ally in order to facilitate discussion of an
   an alternative model for formulation of the "empowered SO/AC model”.   

   I provide the attached presentation not as a formal proposal, but an a comparative
   model that might allow the CCWG to better understand the benefits and potential
   issues with the member-based “Empowered SO/AC model”.

   I am no longer in Buenos Aires, but I would greatly appreciate it if one of you could
   provide this information to the CCWG mailing list, and present it for discussion in a
   working session.  It is my hope that this will allow better understanding of the nature
   of community powers versus legal rights of enforcement (two concepts that have
   been somewhat co-mingled in the ongoing discussion.)  Feel free to forward this
   email publicly as necessary.

Thank you in advance for your consideration!
/John

John Curran
Internet staff

Disclaimer: my views alone