Hi,
Until such time as ewe have community standards on redactions, I think
including the contractual or other provision they are relying on for the
redaction, as Samantha did in her note, is a useful measure.
avri
On 17-Jul-15 09:56, Chris Disspain wrote:
I don’t believe much ‘convincing’ would be necessary el.
Cheers,
Chris
On 17 Jul 2015, at 17:52 , Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.NA
<mailto:el@lisse.NA>> wrote:
I am wondering if we can perhaps convince ICANN to in the interim
when they redact documents, to write something like "Redacted on
request of ........" so that if we were to take ICANN staff by
their word that they only redact because of transparency (!) we
know at least which side they are on :-)-O
greetings, el
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community